久久九九久精品国产日韩经典|中文AV网址在线观看|一级国产精在线观看|免费乱理伦片在线观看

<tt id="bby2d"><blockquote id="bby2d"></blockquote></tt>
  • <strike id="bby2d"><fieldset id="bby2d"><listing id="bby2d"></listing></fieldset></strike>
    <option id="bby2d"><font id="bby2d"></font></option>
  • <div id="bby2d"><strike id="bby2d"></strike></div>

      GMAT考試作文點評分析

      時間:2017-11-08 08:36:30 考試 我要投稿

      GMAT考試作文點評分析

        知道錯在哪里,下次才能改正。以下小編整理的GMAT考試作文點評分析,希望對大家有所幫助,更多信息請關注!

        原題:

        The following appeared as part of an annual report sent to stockholders by Olympic Foods, a processor of frozen foods:

        “Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5-inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits.”

        邏輯漏洞:

        1. false analogy: The food industry is not analogous to the color film industry.

        2.causal oversimplification: Other factors that may contribute t to the cost decline of the printing cost should be considered and ruled out.

        3.gratuitous assumption: The conclusion of the argument is based on a gratuitous assumption that the company can minimize cost and maximize profit because the company has been conducted for 25 years.

        范文:

        The author assumes that since organizations engaged in color-film processing were able to increase efficiency and cut-down costs over a period of 25 years; same must be true of Olympic Foods, which is about to celebrate its 25th anniversary. The arguments is based on questionable assumptions and weak analogies and appears to be a result of a hasty generalization.

        The main problem with the author’s reasoning is the weak analogy he develops between the two “processing” industries. One fails to see any logical connection between the two and the author makes no effort to show the connection either. The two industries are too dissimilar to be compared. For example: frozen food industry faces problem of storage, transportation, contamination etc; no similar problems are observed in the film-processing industry. Even the markets for the two differ widely. The argument could have been strong if the author could show the missing connection or if he had compared the frozen-food industry with a similar industry.

        Also the author fails to recognize that it’s not the number of years of experience that matters; what actually matters is what is learnt over all those years.

      【GMAT考試作文點評分析】相關文章:

      1.關于GMAT作文考試必背句子

      2.考試分析作文

      3.關于gmat作文考試中的佳句小結

      4.關于英語考試作文點評

      5.構建清晰的GMAT考試作文結構介紹

      6.新手備考GMAT考試作文的注意點

      7.考試分析英語作文

      8.分析考試的作文